PIL Watch Group is on X (Twitter). Visit our twitter
handle @pilwatchgroup (https://x.com/pilwatchgroup)
for our views on latest political developments. We have till date 8606 posts in all.
PIL Watch Group is on X (Twitter). Visit our twitter
handle @pilwatchgroup (https://x.com/pilwatchgroup)
for our views on latest political developments. We have till date 8606 posts in all.
PIL Watch Group and AIDS
Bhedbhav Virodhi Andolan (ABVA) are sister organizations. You may like to visit
ABVA’s blog at:
https://aidsbhedbhavvirodhiandolan.blogspot.com/
Also visit ABVA’s Instagram handle (started on 29 May
2026):
ABVA’s
twitter account stands suspended ostensibly at the instance of Elon Musk.
Sir,
This is with reference to the denigration of Indians in general and their duly elected leaders in particular:
1. Language used by you in your Truth Social posts shows that your family set-up, education, work place failed to inculcate civility in your spoken language. What do you say?
2. You
have called us as ‘laptop gangsters’. Why then are your MNCs recruiting Indians
with IT degrees in highest posts?
3. You
refer to our motherland as hellhole. Have you thought what the Nativists think
about you and your ancestors who took away their land by force?
4. You
refer to Indians as bringing their families to US through subterfuge. Does the
family system exist among the whites in US or is it all but broken?
5. If
you have ever read global history the whites colonized 2/3rds of the world and
raised families there including marriage with locals. The locals never took
umbrage. Why should you get bothered now?
6. US
has taken the benefit of getting readymade doctors, engineers, IT experts,
nurses without spending a penny on their education which they received in
India. You recruit them as of use to your economy and pay them pittance and
make them face racial discrimination. Is the US establishment not into
gangsterism?
7. About
15 months earlier you had sent plane-loads of Indians handcuffed, half starved,
allegedly on grounds that they were illegal immigrants. Don’t you dare to
repeat what you did at that time? This action of yours violated national,
international laws.
8. You badly need the services of a psychiatrist to assess your mental health. Are you prepared for that? Else under US state laws restraint can be used to get you to a psychiatric institution for a check-up and for which no court order is needed.
9. You
have denigrated progress of Indian economy by calling it ‘dead-economy’ but which
is one of the fastest growing economies in the world. Do you understand you are
making a laughing stock of US presidency?
10. Do
you understand that your present action at Hormuz has destabilized global
economy?
11. Would
you kindly forget about using nuclear bomb which could threaten countries in
the middle east right up to the shores of India?
12. While
you should feel free to deal with both Pope and Christ as you like, please show
restraint in referring to leaders of India and Indians. Could you honestly
inform the world why you are dodging appearance in Epstein files enquiry by Senate
House Committee?
India like Iran and China are ancient civilizations about which you need to read up so that you show respect that is due to ancient civilizations.
Thanks.
PIL Watch Group
T
Sir,
Media reports in
India indicate certain comments attributable to you and which project India, Indians
in bad light. Your choice of words leaves much to desire. Is this really the
assessment you have about us Indians?
Thanks,
P.S. Sahni &
Shobha Aggarwal
A Bench of the
Supreme Court of India comprising Hon’ble Mr. Justice Rajesh Bindal and Hon’ble
Mr. Justice Vijay Bishnoi on Monday, 9 March 2026 directed the Union of India
to file its counter affidavit in a writ petition challenging the continued
non-enforcement of the Delhi Rent Act, 1995 (“1995 Act”) for nearly
three decades.
The Court
granted the Union Government four weeks to file its counter
affidavit. The petitioner has been permitted to file a rejoinder affidavit
within two weeks thereafter. Earlier, on 7 January 2026, the
Supreme Court had issued notice to the Union Government in the matter.
During the
hearing, the Bench questioned the Government on why the Act has not been
notified. The Government counsel sought time to file counter, stating that the
matter had come up for hearing for the first time.
The Government
also raised a preliminary objection that the petitioner had approached the
Supreme Court directly instead of first moving the High Court.
Responding to
the objection, the petitioner, Ms. Shobha Aggarwal, who is appearing in
person, pointed out that in Common Cause v. Union of India (Judgement
dated 8 October 2003), the Supreme Court had declined to issue a writ of
mandamus directing the Government to notify the Delhi Rent Act, 1995. In light
of that decision, she argued, the High Court would likely have dismissed the
petition at the threshold.
The matter will
be taken up after the completion of pleadings.
The
petition raises an important constitutional question: whether a law duly
enacted by Parliament can be kept in abeyance indefinitely – in the instant
case for over thirty years – without being brought into force?
Case details:
Writ Petition Civil No. 1177/2025 titled Shobha Aggarwal
Vs. Union of India