Following is the text of the letter PIL Watch Group sent to Justice Krishna Iyer by speed-post and his response received by email.
PIL Watch Group letter
29 April, 2014
To
Honorable Justice Shri. V.R.
Krishna Iyer,
[Former Judge, Supreme Court],
"Satgamaya",
Mahatma Gandhi Road,
Ernakulam, Cochin - 682001.
Kerala, India.
[Former Judge, Supreme Court],
"Satgamaya",
Mahatma Gandhi Road,
Ernakulam, Cochin - 682001.
Kerala, India.
Respected Sir,
Sorry to disturb you.
We, at Public Interest
Litigation Watch Group, revisited your treatise on bail viz. Babu Singh and Others V. The State of U.P
[1978 AIR 527], in the context of the case of Tarun Tejpal, former editor Tehelka magazine. He was arrested on 30
November, 2013 in Goa on charges of alleged rape. A charge sheet, running into
approximately 2846 pages was filed on 17 February, 2014 and there are about 159
witnesses. His bail plea was rejected by the Goa Bench of the Bombay High Court
on 14 March, 2014 on the ground that in view of the recent amendments to the
criminal laws the applicant cannot claim to be released on bail on the ground
that the trial will take a long time, since as per the new law the trial has to
be completed within a period of two months from the date of filing of the
charge sheet. This period of two months elapsed on 17 April, 2014. He is still
in jail and the charges are yet to be framed. His bail petition is now pending
in the Supreme Court.
Sir,
the guiding principles laid down in Babu
Singh are routinely flouted by all courts. In the light of the principles
enunciated by you should it be expected that bail would be granted to Tejpal during
the pendency of trial?
Thanks.
Yours
sincerely,
(Dr.
Paramjit Singh)
Secretary,
Public Interest Litigation Watch Group
Js. Krishna Iyer's Response
On Sat, May 3, 2014 at 2:16 PM, vaidyanathapuram Rama Iyer Krishna Iyer<vrkrishnaiyer@gmail.com> wrote:
Dear Dr. Paramjit Singh,
I am sad to read what you have written. The matter is pending in the Supreme Court. I cannot make any observations on a pending matter and that may be contempt. Engage a lawyer who will appear for you to expedite the petition. At my advanced age and invalid health I am always in bed. I can do no more now in my present state of misfortune.With regardsYours sincerelyV.R. KRISHNA IYER
No comments:
Post a Comment